Genedril wrote:I'm confused. Crom says critshot is not equivalent to a bolt. Elrand says he's wrong & goes on to point out how critshots aren't equivalent to bolts. Have I missed something here?
Yeah you'r right as I saw after rereading abit, only thing I really argued with it seems was the comparison Crom did about Bolt haveing a Crit on every hit would be compaired to Critshot.
As the culprit that introduced the topic of rangers in this thread, let me appologies.
We're both of the same side so differences between the classes or thier relative powers doesnt matter.
I was just asking/wishing they would reduce the minimum time between shots on rangers. The only connection with bolts was that, they're making changes to bolts and I was wondering when they would make changes to arrows/bows. Bolts and Bows are different and have nothing to do with each other (IMHO).
Lets close the discussion on bolt v bow and return back to whats good about this change to bolts....
Tasmin wrote:As the culprit that introduced the topic of rangers in this thread, let me appologies.
We're both of the same side so differences between the classes or thier relative powers doesnt matter.
I was just asking/wishing they would reduce the minimum time between shots on rangers. The only connection with bolts was that, they're making changes to bolts and I was wondering when they would make changes to arrows/bows. Bolts and Bows are different and have nothing to do with each other (IMHO).
Lets close the discussion on bolt v bow and return back to whats good about this change to bolts....
Sorry
Tas
Ohwell dosent matter, and yes I agree completely on that the Bowline needs to be looked over, I think this is in the progress to happen though, when it will happen I don't know.
anyone who has just tuned in, welcome to freddyshouse.
Xest wrote:What's wrong with worms, have you ever tried to kill one? every time you try and cut it in half it becomes twice as hard to kill and over and over until you have an army of partial worms.
Craft wrote:anyone who has just tuned in, welcome to freddyshouse.
We would of all been banned. Anyway a bit of confrontation doesnt do forums any harm, infact its one of the reasons they exists. Also keeps the activity up.
What you wouldnt see on freddyshouse is the response that followed from Elrand (thanks).
Crom, Druid of Na Fianna Dragun
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...the A(nimist)-Team
Cromcruaich wrote:We would of all been banned. Anyway a bit of confrontation doesnt do forums any harm, infact its one of the reasons they exists. Also keeps the activity up.
What you wouldnt see on freddyshouse is the response that followed from Elrand (thanks).
Yeah, well I don't want to turn into someone who needs to have right no matter what just for the sake of it, but hard to admit something until you see you have gotten it wrong =P
Freddies House? I missed the random insults, cries of QQ more n00b, a couple of +1's, a ding grats, some ding grats whine & an ibtl in this thread then.
2 people had a disagreement - it happens. They found they weren't disagreeing at all actually & one of them even apologised for it. If that's the standard on FH then I'm reading the wrong bit of it.
Those that can't lead follow.
Those that can lead should admit when they're lost.
