Those that exploit run thru
There's a difference between what players deem an exploit/bug and what Mythic/GOA does.
If mentioned as a bug by Mythic/GOA then it is and if you have clear evidence of abusers, then you should report them.
Players on the other hand, have a tendency to call stuff they don't master/find fair cheats, exploits and the like.
Hell, very basic example. If someone who's very good at aiming in Counter-Strike, you'll often see them yelled at and probably banned from several servers, simply because the other players don't believe that he's "skilled".
Making a personal vendetta doesn't really help, and especially not when you seem to be the only one actually feeling it's a bug exploit. You should RightNow you question about the validity of your claim and then see what the answer is.
If mentioned as a bug by Mythic/GOA then it is and if you have clear evidence of abusers, then you should report them.
Players on the other hand, have a tendency to call stuff they don't master/find fair cheats, exploits and the like.
Hell, very basic example. If someone who's very good at aiming in Counter-Strike, you'll often see them yelled at and probably banned from several servers, simply because the other players don't believe that he's "skilled".
Making a personal vendetta doesn't really help, and especially not when you seem to be the only one actually feeling it's a bug exploit. You should RightNow you question about the validity of your claim and then see what the answer is.
Merely Mortal
Waiting for WAR, both the virtual and the real
Formerly on Hib/Pryd as:
Damarmas, Cias, Bryce, Line
Formerly on Hib/Pryd as:
Damarmas, Cias, Bryce, Line
-
- Emerald Rider
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:51 pm
I made a post to congratulate those who adequatly utilise an ingame feature after the responce i got for incorectly complaining that it was an exploit 
Thats been closed ....

Thats been closed ....

Amedor wrote:I could imagine George Bush playing a Warlock
pikeh wrote:Britney Spears plays a bainshee.
Requiel wrote:It's not a bug, the encounter is designed to fail if you abuse the game mechanics... If you'd like to report yourself for cheating we'll investigate your problem.
You missed out a couple of extra exclamation marks at the end afaikShiShi wrote:my 2 cent on the topic,
proper spelling would be here:
WIN!!111111111eleven

-
Paddock - L60 Male Man Hunter - SM Tailor
Moegren - L53 Male Man Captain - SM Weaponsmith GM Woodworker
Paddreth - L60 Male Man Minstrel - SM Jeweller GM Cook
Skyros - L57 Male Man Loremaster - SM Scholar GM Farmer
Pauncho - L60 Male Hobbit Burglar - SM Armoursmith
-

Paddock - L60 Male Man Hunter - SM Tailor
Moegren - L53 Male Man Captain - SM Weaponsmith GM Woodworker
Paddreth - L60 Male Man Minstrel - SM Jeweller GM Cook
Skyros - L57 Male Man Loremaster - SM Scholar GM Farmer
Pauncho - L60 Male Hobbit Burglar - SM Armoursmith
-

Thought Mythic had fixed at least the first one? Or did they say they were going to and just never did as usualPuppet wrote:Im refering to 2 bugs, which are 'bugs' :
1) Moving on 'normal speed' on water-surface intentionally used, despite being on 5% hp. Very funny if a skald snares you, jumps in the water (when on 5% hp) and zooms off on sprint-speed, then turns on his Mach5 and goes on Mach5 off, on low HP.
2) Moving backwards in the water doesnt slow you down (like normal moving backwards does on land). In some combination of cases, you can abuse this to land melee-hits, where the enemy is unable to hit you back. People who know how to do this are *VERY* aware of doing this, and abuse this alot.
Unfortunaly Mythic is unable to fix both things, which really sucks, especially if you are a stealther and most fights are situated near bridges (water).

Childofkhain wrote:I made a post to congratulate those who adequatly utilise an ingame feature after the responce i got for incorectly complaining that it was an exploit
Thats been closed ....
I'm not surprised. Quinlan and Banana have made it clear that they don't want this sort of list on the forum. I notice you are editing your first post on this thread to add names still. And I think editing Quinlan's comment to change a crucial not to now, totally changing the meaning of what he said, is going a bit far. I'm assuming you changed that not Quinlan.
yep he did...let's just say it was not the smartest thing to doKallima wrote:I'm not surprised. Quinlan and Banana have made it clear that they don't want this sort of list on the forum. I notice you are editing your first post on this thread to add names still. And I think editing Quinlan's comment to change a crucial not to now, totally changing the meaning of what he said, is going a bit far. I'm assuming you changed that not Quinlan.

