Stealth has been in the game since day 1 you would have thought people would learn to deal with it by now.
Stealth busting charmed pets, no real difference to summoned pets popping you after you've stealthed, old true sight, new stealth lore & PN's. If as a stealther your dumb (or sad enough) to camp bridges all day you deserve to get busted. Again, just learn to deal with it.
Gandelf is a special case imo, ive read his posts for years now, some i laugh at some i shake my head, even argued with him a few times with my own replies. Some of you want to remember that this is a public forum where anyone can post there own views & opinions, your all entitled to disagree with him, thats your opinion.
Its just a damn shame you cant discuss anything on these boards nowdays, it goes from one extreme to the other, no wonder there so few new threads posted.
Stealth lore pets wtf
Dardalion wrote:Gandelf is a special case imo, ive read his posts for years now, some i laugh at some i shake my head, even argued with him a few times with my own replies.
Why thank you!
That's the best compliment anyone has ever paid me!
I am quite flattered that I'm considered "special".
Someone's bound to say next that it was not a compliment, but rather, an insult!
I am in no doubt that it's a compliment!
I've learned to deal with stealth, Dard. But I'd still prefer the game without it. It just adds nothing to my enjoyment. I know several stealthers who I like and respect. Mainly these are rangers who try to keep the enemy gankers at bay, but also some NS who just fight other stealthers. For these few people I know and like there are a tonne of enemy stealthers who just hang around waiting on easy targets. And like Gandelf said, it's not uncommon for them to do something childish after they've done me.
It's just my personal preference, but judging by the number of complaints on the forums both by stealthers (about adding, stealth groups, etc) and non-stealthers (about ganking), I can't see how making the stealth game separate would hurt anyone. Looks like it would improve the game for all concerned.
If stealth classes could only attack (and be attacked by) other stealth classes, they never get added on by a non-stealther and they'd always be fighting a challenging gameplay against other stealthers. All we'd lose is the pointless gankings that don't improve the game for anyone.
Gandelf, you're a loony. Make that a compliment
It's just my personal preference, but judging by the number of complaints on the forums both by stealthers (about adding, stealth groups, etc) and non-stealthers (about ganking), I can't see how making the stealth game separate would hurt anyone. Looks like it would improve the game for all concerned.
If stealth classes could only attack (and be attacked by) other stealth classes, they never get added on by a non-stealther and they'd always be fighting a challenging gameplay against other stealthers. All we'd lose is the pointless gankings that don't improve the game for anyone.
Gandelf, you're a loony. Make that a compliment
Peat Bog, Animist <Iron Wolves>
Cryn Twyn, Bard <Iron Wolves>
Tape Gob, Eldritch <Iron Wolves>
Inventor of the Lagapult™
House 3303, Cior Barr. Come Visit.
Now playing ... WAR on Karak Eight Peaks
Irony, Runepriest <NFD>
Sable, Witch Hunter <NFD>
Cryn Twyn, Bard <Iron Wolves>
Tape Gob, Eldritch <Iron Wolves>
Inventor of the Lagapult™
House 3303, Cior Barr. Come Visit.
Now playing ... WAR on Karak Eight Peaks
Irony, Runepriest <NFD>
Sable, Witch Hunter <NFD>
