Reply to Bubble (V.long!)

General 'Hibernian' forum for the entire cluster
User avatar
Sharkith
Posts: 2910
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 12:08 pm

Reply to Bubble (V.long!)

Post by Sharkith »

Hi sorry about this folks but Bubble started an interesting thread on FH and well my reply didn't seem to fit over there so I am posting it here. The original post is at this link:

http://forums.freddyshouse.com/showthread.php?t=62905&page=1&pp=15

It basically asks this question...... I though it was a good question and unfortunetaly I think I got carried away in my reply (below) :(
Bubble wrote:I'd like to know how people react on the battlefield, so please reply with your own point of view.
An interesting question - a long reply - so be warned!

This problem is peculiar. My views on it have changed from the time when I wondered what all the whine about adding was and could not get it. I don’t think I fully understand it yet because it is more complicated than it seems. I don’t think there is any real answer. So with that in mind try the following as a way to interpret what is going on.

One way to see it is like a play where the actors (can I use protagonists?) play out various 'scripts'. A script is what happens in a gaming session (can last from 1-24 hours by the sounds of things!). During the enacting of the script the level of orientation of the player has major implications for the manner in which the script will appear to them. Players can start a session being orientated to one of four levels of playing:
a) realm versus realm,
b) zerg versus zerg,
c) group versus group,
d) person versus person,

The levels of playing are crucial because it gives the script its symbolism.

What you did at the start of the post was change your orientation from one level to another and you started to see the symbolic differences in your ‘script’ for the night. Essentially in the game whether we like it or not the outcome of the script for the evening is in a large manner determined by the orientation of the player when they start playing .

realm versus realm
Orientation to this level typically involves relic takes and keep takes, defence of the realm and the killing of the enemy at all cost. Anything goes to be frank. Some people only play at this level “For Aurfur Meights!” others like to come here occasionally.

Because of the game mechanics the scripts for this level include for example, the classic love triangle (I kid you not) where one realm is the bitch (Hibernia right now and in Old frontiers) of the other two realms. Other scripts will include the heroic/epic struggle to get a relic and help the whole realm etc. Scripts at this level seem to be played in zergs of many groups of eight trying to organise their actions (the GG’s running on the fringes of the main force are as much part of this script).

zerg versus zerg
This is a messy level here you get various orientations from hanging out with your meights around a bridge or tower. Preferably where you can port back to asap. The taking of a single tower to block porting and piss off the other zerg or the retaking of a keep. So scripts at this level can either be the aimless hanging around like juveniles looking for trouble (piss take) or the achieving of an objective. I prefer the latter to be honest so I tend to avoid hanging out. This level is not about balance or about even being ToA’ed it is about hiding in a crowd that is better described as a mob. It is mob rules and the notion of honour very seldom enters such an evenings gaming. It is also no accident that you find stealther around these mobs btw..

I think this is the most casual orientation you can get in the game.

Side note: It is also interesting to see people on FH treat the zergers around bridges like juveniles – not ‘real’ gamers etc…

group versus group
At this level you get the orientation to a ‘natural’ group and the emergence of the phenomena of the fully opted group and the beginning of notions of honour and challenge. Scripts for this level include ‘seek and destroy’. It seems that teams like to establish reputations and then to defend these reputations. It is also about following the changes in the game closely and figuring out how the 8 v’s 8 situation is best manipulated to a teams advantage. Losing to another group is considered fair enough but when a second group adds then that is considered a breach of the code and so you get a spiral of ‘adding’.

This is an over simplistic view of things. I do not have much experience here. These orientations also seem to be about a close bunch of friends who have played together for long periods of time continuing to do so. There must be lots of group banter and chat along with sharing of outside game issues I imagine – I am sure this has a lot going for it. You also get the orientation of l33t but that gets laughed at by some of the old school etc etc.

one versus one
At this level scripts tend to be formed around the code of honour where individuals like to fight each other with minimal interference. From reading the forms they also like to tease each other and reward each other with respect. There must be more to the scripts here but once again I have never played much with this in mind so I am pretty clueless here.

Ok now given these levels of orientation for a player in an evening what really happens is that you get a mixing of the various orientations. In the end then the script that shapes how your evenings gaming is experienced is dependent on who you meet. It gets very messy.

One rule you can be sure of is that in all probability when a group with an orientation higher up in the list meets a group or individual who have an orientation lower down in the list that the higher up group will more often than not realise their goals and so be quite happy. The crossing of orientations then produces a kind of tragedy for the soloer or the FG people because their goals for the evening have been hampered.

Not only this but the promotion of status quo zerging as you can see is a promotion of mob rule which is what some people have accidentally achieved. In some respects now we have two zergs who never go fight each other and who simply camp their tower/bridge in Hibernia. It is mob rule and mob rule to the max.

So two things might help understand your predicament player orientations are different and often clash and the outcome of the clashes are the scripts for an evenings gaming. If the script does not match expectations then people log. The random zerg with no aim quite often wins because it is a kind of mob rule.


The bottom line however, is that you are all roleplayers because you all have an orientation to the game and you all play out a script no matter who you are…..
Na Fianna Dragun

Karak-Eight Peaks, Kiera ze Witch Hunter

Eve online - Kaminjosvig.

User avatar
Luz
Emerald Rider
Posts: 818
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:26 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by Luz »

The Matrix.. or like, what the hell?
When you say "script" I think of computer run scripts...

I dont understand this post lol :surrender
Bah. Lv50s.
Animist, Bard, Druid, Enchanter, Nightshade, Vampiir

User avatar
Heta
Emerald Rider
Posts: 1540
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 10:24 am

Post by Heta »

and I'm just a troll and cant read when its to much words :(


the :monkey: is fun tho
Woho! I got a 360 \o/
Image

User avatar
Sharkith
Posts: 2910
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 12:08 pm

Post by Sharkith »

Luz wrote:The Matrix.. or like, what the hell?
When you say "script" I think of computer run scripts...

I dont understand this post lol :surrender
substitute plot for script then you might have less confusion. Every situation has a plot even in a game like this.
Na Fianna Dragun

Karak-Eight Peaks, Kiera ze Witch Hunter

Eve online - Kaminjosvig.

User avatar
stupeh
Emerald Rider
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:56 am

Post by stupeh »

Heta wrote:and I'm just a troll and cant read when its to much words :(


the :monkey: is fun tho
You suck.
~

User avatar
Heta
Emerald Rider
Posts: 1540
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 10:24 am

Post by Heta »

less flatter in public
Woho! I got a 360 \o/
Image

Alexandrinus
Emerald Rider
Posts: 1523
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Austria

Post by Alexandrinus »

its really easy there is war out there,and there are victimes,and everybody who dont want adding mids albs hibs should stay away from NF.
OK i dont like it either when i solo and get some adds,but thats the fights i remember when i pwn 2 peeps.
But when i go out there i have to respect that everything can happen, from the Paladin which cant hit you once to the sorc which pwns you from far away,or 2-3 enemy stealther or archers.
The place where you can find which enemies at wich time,tells you the realm map and your experiance,also where you can run and hide:-).
So i think this Bubble whine is really unnesecarry, if he want to look at enemy fights he should roll a stealther with 50stealth and MOS5.

Arkaon / Karak-Norn
and plenty of other chars between 10 and 30

User avatar
Sharkith
Posts: 2910
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 12:08 pm

Post by Sharkith »

I did not really think it was a whine just a plea ;) .....oh and you agree with me on the game then!
Na Fianna Dragun

Karak-Eight Peaks, Kiera ze Witch Hunter

Eve online - Kaminjosvig.

Alexandrinus
Emerald Rider
Posts: 1523
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Austria

Post by Alexandrinus »

[quote="Sharkith"]I did not really think it was a whine just a plea ]
hehehe yes but at the entry of the treat he speaks about getting ganked all the time (and that as an really bad solo class :moose: )

the truth? ok was too long for me and after reading the first few sentences i said what i thought about this tread, i read it already yesterday in FH.
(i blame the 27°C in my office for cant following all these english words)

Arkaon / Karak-Norn
and plenty of other chars between 10 and 30

User avatar
Trez
Emerald Rider
Posts: 859
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Denmark

Post by Trez »

I must agree with Alex, the game is set up for Realm vs. Realm, not FG vs. FG or solo vs. solo, so ppl should always expect to be added on no matter what.
Image

Image

Post Reply

Return to “Hibernian Cluster Discussion”