
Take care and see you on the field :rambo:
Zakoraya, the Cat

Reza wrote:Define cross-realming.
Its not black and white, and there will definetly be a whole lot of murky grey in the middle.
In simple terms people who play on 2 realms in 1 server have access to information that those who play on only 1 of those respective realms dont. This asymmetry of information gives the people playing on 2 realms an advantage vis-a-vis those only playing on 1.
This advantage is hard to mitigate against even with all the good intention of the player playing on 2 realms. Afterall you cant make urself unknow something. At best u can pretend like you dont know and put on ur 'alb hat' and 'hib hat' and try to ask yourself how you would have acted had you not known what u know, but in practice you may pick up alot that isnt even realised and thus act on it unknowingly (this is taking a charitable view). It doesnt all have to be about blurting out relic raid details. There are alot of other more subtle but also important details people can pick up whilst playing within a realm, and it is v hard for someone to then pretend they dont know them when they are back playing amongst the enemy.
This is basically just a classic case of a 'conflict of interest' where even not questioning the intentions of the person with the conflict, most people can see why its best to avoid it.
In the business world such things as 'chinese walls' exist to prevent equivilant situations, and of course daoc is only a game so you might not take it so seriously, but you cant be suprised when there are those who point out the problem.
Having said all this, people /sending you abuse is of course a different issue, as is the CoC in many ways. The only time ive seen this discussed was on the eclipse /as and regardless of what the letter of the CoC says, there is nothing against an alliance debating things and forming their own views of what they expect of members.
There is nothing to justify anyone giving you abuse. There is equally nothing that you can say to justify your earlier generalisation:Rejecta wrote:haha, I suffer from a medical condition known as insomnia, I can't get a good sleep pattern, that day I woke up at 4am, logged on to play my minstrel, check some artis etc..found out there was a relic raid and went.
I'm so sad because I can't help getting up early
As far as I can see if you were awake when the Albs went on their alarm clock raid then there was equally nothing to stop you logging on to Hib to help defend the relic when you knew we were the underdogs. You didn't. As one of the 14 in the BG at the time, wether or not this is a game it hurt to hear you goad people in FH and elsewhere - personally I feel you have made your choices and I can honestly understand if some are quite angry with you.Rejecta wrote:"So far I am not seeing the comunity spirit that Hiberna is so famed for, all I am seeing is a bunch of bitching, moaning cocks who think it's ok to ruin my game time with personal insults."
Personally I would concider it true crossrealming if he logged on alb only to see a relic raid towards hib and then swap to hib to defend cos we got less people. Imo he did the right thing to stay in alb since thats the realm he logged on and not let his feelings or knowledge about hib control his actions.Sharkith wrote:As far as I can see if you were awake when the Albs went on their alarm clock raid then there was equally nothing to stop you logging on to Hib to help defend the relic when you knew we were the underdogs.
no, thats the impression he got when he logged into hib. i think the fact that everytime he logs on he gets PM's saying how hes not welcome or whatever, that is justification enough to make hib/pry not seem like the friendly place he had heard about.Sharkith wrote: There is equally nothing that you can say to justify your earlier generalisation:
.