Sorry dear but technically you were correct.Satyn wrote:o ... k ... my angel comment was sarcastic guys ...
If you live by the letter of the law and try to be a good person then to most people you would be an angel

Remember your smilie!!


Cause that won't happen, there is no god, and no heaven. When you die you are dead, thats it. Learn to live with life and stop living in a dream worldGandelf wrote:With the risk of sounding morbid, if, when you die, it suddenly becomes clear that the Gospel was true, then if you've believed it and believed in Jesus, then you've lost nothing. If you haven't believed, then you will have lost everything. Isn't it worth taking a chance on the Gospel for that reason alone?
I ame to please hunSharkith wrote:You do realise you just ruined his week?
That's not entirely fair and a rather ignorant view. I accept the possibility of an existence of some entity which could be classed as a god, however this has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution is a proven process with reproduceable proof and is a set of ideas that can quite happily stand alongside the existence of god, being an "evolutionist" needs to have no bearing on whether or not you believe in a god. So whilst I acknowledge the possibility of some entity (a god if you like) that could have full or little work in the creation of the universe I also see it as the least likely possible answer, there are simply better explanations out there and these explanations strengthen daily whilst the creationist explanation weakens. What I particularly disagree with however is the whole "the world/universe is only 6,000 years old" argument, that is frankly idiotic, there's a plethora of evidence that demonstrates otherwise. Particularly in the case of the universe, we can see light with our own eyes from objects so far away that what we see is a much higher than 6,000 year old view of the object and if you don't trust your own senses, then why assume that anything whatsoever is real? Of course it's convenient to believe the earth is only this old because to accept the reality that it's older begs the question - why did religious events only start occurring on the earth 6,000 years ago and not much earlier? It's convenient if the advent of religion ties in with the advent of humans.Gandelf wrote:Likewise, some of the evolutionists like Xest, still remain unswerving in their disbelief in God.
Satyn wrote:You need to tell me one thing tho Gandy ... what on earth happened that made you such a strong believer?
What's the relevance of this? there's no evidence it's anything more than a story with no more evidence for it than Lord of the Rings. Even if it were to be true why does it in anyway show that their beliefs were real? It means no more than you telling us you believe in god, dying for your beliefs for example doesn't make your beliefs any more valid. I'm not sure what you're actually trying to demonstrate in this paragraph.Gandelf wrote:Secondly, Christianity is the only religion where the "leader" of the religion willingly allowed themself to be killed because of his beliefs. No other religion can claim that. Also, out of all the apostles of Jesus, only one died through old age and natural causes. All the others were put to death for what they preached. If they were willing to allow that to happen, then surely they must have believed without reservation the truth about God and Jesus?
Xest wrote:That's not entirely fair and a rather ignorant view. I accept the possibility of an existence of some entity which could be classed as a god.