Sorry for posting the PM if it infringes upon forum rules here. Yes, it's not from these forums. Ty for editing, would have done so myself had I been aware of policy here. The only reason I posted a PM in the first place is sort of a knee-jerk reaction to being told privately that I am forbidden from discussing something publicly, when I see no decent reason not to. This makes no sense unless you follow the aggramonday thread on FH.
But anyway, I really feel the need to express my opinion on this, I realise it's completely inconsequential and petty. It *is* very much DAoC related however. The circumstances only exist because of events occuring in-game recently. Anyway, here are my opinions, if a mod is unhappy with anything please let me know in PM I'll be online and will edit instantly.
Slayn wrote:I'm getting very upset by this behaviour. At this stage I feel there is a continual effort to suppress any further discussion on a matter very much related to rvr in prydwen. So what if it focuses on a particular guild? There is specific stuff said about guilds/individuals all the time, that stuff should only be modded if it is unreasonable, untrue, abusive etc. The stuff being said in the threads was none of these things. The fact that two threads have now been deleted that draw attention to my opinion about that feels as though there is an attempt to suppress these opinions and stop other people perhaps scrutinising the mods activity.
Anyway, it's over a completely petty matter all this stuff developed in the first place. The thing is, when you are stopped saying something you wanted to say, you want to say that thing about a million times more, no matter how pointless it was, or how little you cared about it in the first place. I must say I am very angry at all mod behaviour since eggy initially closed the first thread.
What annoys me is that first an embarassing line of enquiry was nipped in the bud by mod action. And then other people's legitimate desire to discuss and question mod action (God knows why you feel you should be able to prevent people doing this) was not just closed but deleted. I believe mods are mods and they should have the authority to take action, but when they do things in such a way as to hide questionable actions from forum users, it's pretty low imo.
If you felt your modding was in line with policy and justified, why did you delete rather than just closing the post?
Anyway, I think you can tell I am now on a real mission about this, when it was something I couldn't care less about to start with except that it gave me some mild amusement. I feel very provoked etc. And ofc now I am told that any further open discussion, no matter how reasonable, diplomatic or *WHAT ITS FORM MAY BE*, will be deleted and I'll be banned. Eggy's PM clearly indicates that it is the content of what I'm saying, not the form or delivery that is off limits. That to me is complete censorship.
cheers,
Slayn
[edit]I probably posted this thread in the wrong place. Do move it to off-topic or wherever if you think it's better suited elsewhere.[/edit]
This upsets me because Woodie Allen is right, that stuff doesn't hardly ever happen in real life. So this is a thread to (hopefully) ressurrect the moment, and ofc to discuss other 'Annie Hall' moments that people have had. It is not a targetted whine, it is exactly what it says on the tin, a discussion of a scene in Annie Hall as well as comparable scenes that occur in DAoC exc/pryd cluster.
