Server Clustering(?) in EU!? GOA please reply.

Jupiler · Post by **Jupiler** » Sat Apr 16, 2005 11:45 pm

well i hope they DONT cluster the ToA zones, that would make the prices on artis/scrolls for a more 'casual' player like me insane..

Amedor · Post by **Amedor** » Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:03 am

Jupiler wrote:well i hope they DONT cluster the ToA zones, that would make the prices on artis/scrolls for a more 'casual' player like me insane..

It would make the prices lower, wouldn't it? Because there will be more artifacts and scrolls around to sell.. so lower prices.

Treeeebeard · Post by **Treeeebeard** » Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:15 am

Hib/Exc with have a bigger player base therefore more people wanting the scrolls. If they cluster the TOA zone it = less artifacts also, Not clustering it = more as clustiner the toa zone make 1 between both relams, Not clustering the toa zone makes 2 seperate ToA's between realms but both can go t eachovers I think.

Post by **Lairiodd** » Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:58 am

The ideal might be to cluster pryd + excal + "blank"

. Give us all an extra virtual server. In effect, 3 zones shared between 2 servers worth of players.

Post by **Xest** » Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:49 am

The ideal situation for Prydwen would be clustering of frontiers only, whereas as Lairiodd says, you'd still get trades in the frontiers, it'd still minimize any damage to Prydwen's community which is the best thing it has going for it really.

Adianna · Post by **Adianna** » Sun Apr 17, 2005 6:58 am

At least ToA should not be clustered. You can still participate ML Raids on any Server in the Cluster afaik but you have twice the amount of artifact spots on the Cluster compared to a normal server. Any other zones clustered... well it depends... hardly anyone is still leveling up normal though clustering the PvM zones would probably help (you could always go to an instance couldn't you?

)

Treeeebeard wrote:Hib/Exc with have a bigger player base therefore more people wanting the scrolls.

There would be more players farming scrolls also, and more players would be farming ToA jewelry so there would be an increase on those... main problem is about artifacts and rare drops.

Sharkith · Post by **Sharkith** » Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:45 am

where can I vote against? This is a server for local people. We don't want no trouble here. These are local articfacts for local people. You cannot have the precious things of the local ToA....

Kesxex · Post by **Kesxex** » Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:51 am

I am dead against clustering "just" the English servers. If this really happens, then RvR only please.
More likely I would want to see all the small population servers (no matter what language) to be clustered.

Whatever the language problems might be - at least we all have them in one way or the other. And tbh a lot of "translators" are already playing on an English server.

Sardine · Post by **Sardine** » Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:09 pm

Who wants to bet that i'll need to upgrade from my 1.1ghz when we get clustering x< ?

pikeh · Post by **pikeh** » Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:56 pm

getting a bit confused about all of this to be honest. Is clustering where you have TWO different zones (say NF in this case) or, that both servers have ONE merged NF zone? (i guess its only one merged zone)