State of the realm
That works for all apostrophes except its and it's. It's is omission, but its is ownership and yet doesn't have an apostrophe. Damn English and its myriad exceptions...!
Edit: possibly because the ownership is indirect? If you talk about "its tail" there is a subject in there which has the ownership of the tail; "the dog's tail" or "the unicorn's flowing pink tail"...?
Edit: possibly because the ownership is indirect? If you talk about "its tail" there is a subject in there which has the ownership of the tail; "the dog's tail" or "the unicorn's flowing pink tail"...?
Ambera the Heroine
Avery, Thid NS & Potion Monkey
Ascarii the Warden
Animamba, Verdant Ani
Ahoulin, Luri Screamer
long-tailed nanny-o
Avery, Thid NS & Potion Monkey
Ascarii the Warden
Animamba, Verdant Ani
Ahoulin, Luri Screamer
long-tailed nanny-o
- Cromcruaich
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 5:59 pm
- Location: North West, UK
I'm crying irl.
Crom, Druid of Na Fianna Dragun
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...the A(nimist)-Team
Cue music for full effect.
Thanks to Tuthmes for the link.
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...the A(nimist)-Team
Cue music for full effect.
Thanks to Tuthmes for the link.
[quote="ambera"]That works for all apostrophes except its and it's. It's is omission, but its is ownership and yet doesn't have an apostrophe. Damn English and its myriad exceptions...!
Edit: possibly because the ownership is indirect? If you talk about "its tail" there is a subject in there which has the ownership of the tail]
The reason is that "its" is single lexical item. It isn't "it" + "s", it is a pronoun showing possession, filling the same syntactic role as "his" and "her". It's just coincidence it ends with "s", the "s" has not been added.
This is not a case where English is inconsistent. We might say apostrophe usage is one of the few cases where it IS consistent
Edit: possibly because the ownership is indirect? If you talk about "its tail" there is a subject in there which has the ownership of the tail]
The reason is that "its" is single lexical item. It isn't "it" + "s", it is a pronoun showing possession, filling the same syntactic role as "his" and "her". It's just coincidence it ends with "s", the "s" has not been added.
This is not a case where English is inconsistent. We might say apostrophe usage is one of the few cases where it IS consistent
Peat Bog, Animist <Iron Wolves>
Cryn Twyn, Bard <Iron Wolves>
Tape Gob, Eldritch <Iron Wolves>
Inventor of the Lagapult™
House 3303, Cior Barr. Come Visit.
Now playing ... WAR on Karak Eight Peaks
Irony, Runepriest <NFD>
Sable, Witch Hunter <NFD>
Cryn Twyn, Bard <Iron Wolves>
Tape Gob, Eldritch <Iron Wolves>
Inventor of the Lagapult™
House 3303, Cior Barr. Come Visit.
Now playing ... WAR on Karak Eight Peaks
Irony, Runepriest <NFD>
Sable, Witch Hunter <NFD>
So in summing up this thread.....'tate of the realm'...
some great people,
some great alliances,
some great guilds,
some quiet alliances,
some inactive guilds,
but all with a great command of the English language (at least after the latest lesson). Wonder what the next great topic of importance to hijack this thread will be? The other subject close to the heart of every Englishman, the weather?
Can we get this back on topic?
Cheers
Tas
some great people,
some great alliances,
some great guilds,
some quiet alliances,
some inactive guilds,
but all with a great command of the English language (at least after the latest lesson). Wonder what the next great topic of importance to hijack this thread will be? The other subject close to the heart of every Englishman, the weather?
Can we get this back on topic?
Cheers
Tas