The person is putting in the extra time, so it does cost him something. Why should someone who plays twice as much not get twice as much stuff?Cryn wrote:If your competitor magically has 10 times your production capacity (remember, the extra capacity doesn't cost him anything) then you cannot compete. He can choose to either produce units cheaper and price you out of the market, or put more time into each piece and make a product you cannot match.
This is inflation and can be a problem, but I think it isn't as big an issue as you think it is. However, if a casual player was to attend raids, they could then sell what they don't want. The reason that artis are so costly is that they are rare/hard to get. The price just reflects that.The point here is that market forces are only fair when all players within the market have equal ability to produce cash. If I make 1p a week through my normal playing habits, and someone else makes 5p a week through normal playing habits, I have less spending power.
Do they have enough time to attend the raids to get the stuff ? If they created arti groups that got everyone in the group an arti, I think it is likely that they wouldn't have time to get fully equipped. The problem is not the price of artis, but the time needed to get them. The market lets you bypass the time requirement nearly entirely and/or use time spent on one raid to offset the time on another.A loot split where they are not competing against the whole raid is often their main chance of gaining an item they need. In the time they have online they cannot generate enough cash to cover today's prices.
A casual player might think that getting TOA'ed is just about doing each arti encounter once. However, in effect, you need to either do a raid once per group member or pay for the arti.
The problem is that getting artis is an (intentional) time sink. I don't see how need before greed can solve this unless you want non-casual players to donate their time to help casual players get the stuff. If they do, then that's fine, if they don't then it's not greed.