Maeloch wrote:
Also, solo atm = 1 or mebbe 2 areas. Clustering will open up some more zones for this.
Mael, 50th ment.
Indeed. This is SO true. The reason why solo'ing on Prydwen is so hard as is - is because of the fact there's only 2 spots to go for solo-action: Beno and Bled; and Beno is often very quiet.
So everyone wants 'some' action and goes Brynja ---> overcrowded; everyone wants a piece of the RP-cake and the adding/zerging starts.
When the server gets bigger people will realise Beno is nice, Crauchon perhaps. People wont go Beno because odds getting ganked solo so will take a boat from Boldiam ----> another solo spot etc etc etc.
Briannon wrote:If you bring FH flamers here they simply become Prydwen.net flamers. A change of forum can't reprogramme their genes and undo the genetic stupidity many exhibit.
The calmness on this forum is due to the highly effective modding ... or so I tell myself ... though maybe calming FH regulars might be a challenge.
Also, alot of the threads here are organising raids, so maybe we would get a different cross-section of people compared to FH.
Prydwen Lairiodd Level 50 Nightshade and Legendary Grandmaster Smith (1065) check prices here Lairirian Level 50 Mana Mentalist and Legendary Spellcrafter (TDD) Lairgreybark Level 50 Arb Animist Lairmindlock Level 50 Bard (TDD) Camlann Lairthall Level 35+ Friar
Stocking one 99% of most of the useful spellcrafting gems at Houses 3304 and 3306
Briannon wrote:If you bring FH flamers here they simply become Prydwen.net flamers. A change of forum can't reprogramme their genes and undo the genetic stupidity many exhibit.
not nessicarly
peeps tend to flame there marely because they can it seems.
Ive seen people from these forums (myself included) use harsher words when there simply because its the 'norm'
It is not the norm here so they wouldnt do it
Besides any idiots and we can pass them through our Xest filter
Lievaordiea x Eldritch
Peonchants x Enchanter
Hibernia
[quote="Puppet"]Indeed. This is SO true. The reason why solo'ing on Prydwen is so hard as is - is because of the fact there's only 2 spots to go for solo-action: Beno and Bled]
Yep exactly - my experience has definetely been that larger servers = more soloing potential, there's just more people spread around - more people running to join fights and such to pick off. Also more tower takes tend to happen again adding to the amount of people who are heading to fights alone/duo and such. You do have to be active in finding those people however, people can't just camp like they could at AMG like some whiney stealthers on VN seem to think they should have the right to be able to do but the rps are there if you're active enough to move around to the different hotspots where potential targets will be.
OFFICER XEST - PROTECTING YOU AGAINST FORUM CRIME
Che Xefan, el presidente.
peeps tend to flame there marely because they can it seems.
Ive seen people from these forums (myself included) use harsher words when there simply because its the 'norm'
It is not the norm here so they wouldnt do it
Besides any idiots and we can pass them through our Xest filter
yesss FH brings out the Mr Hyde in my Dr Jekyl
Nothing in the world can take the place of persistance. Talent will not: nothing more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not: unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts.
Persistance and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan "press on" has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.......
As we've discussed in some depth before, clustering pryd and excal will, by it's very nature place restrictions on the use of the accounts operated by multi-server players. Recently I renewed two accounts before clustering was raised as an issue, and they were renewed on the basis of the current flexibility and options that I enjoy. Therefore, if clustering goes ahead, and the mulit-server restrictions are introduced, does this represent a breach of contract by GOA that will enable me to obtain a full refund of the subs I have paid? Does this represent a change of game play that is so significant as to make the agreement between me and GOA void?
If clustering goes ahead I will certainly be looking for a refund of the unused subscription period on my accounts on the basis that the product I have subscribed to has been changed to such an extent that had I known that at the time of renewal I would not have renewed the accounts for the time period that I did.
Briannon wrote:Here's one for the lawyers in our community.
As we've discussed in some depth before, clustering pryd and excal will, by it's very nature place restrictions on the use of the accounts operated by multi-server players. Recently I renewed two accounts before clustering was raised as an issue, and they were renewed on the basis of the current flexibility and options that I enjoy. Therefore, if clustering goes ahead, and the mulit-server restrictions are introduced, does this represent a breach of contract by GOA that will enable me to obtain a full refund of the subs I have paid? Does this represent a change of game play that is so significant as to make the agreement between me and GOA void?
If clustering goes ahead I will certainly be looking for a refund of the unused subscription period on my accounts on the basis that the product I have subscribed to has been changed to such an extent that had I known that at the time of renewal I would not have renewed the accounts for the time period that I did.
No. Read the EULA where GOA states that they can change the game any time in any way. You accepted that and get over it
... though maybe calming FH regulars might be a challenge.
