Raid leaders claiming loot discussion -- split from Rowennas Ml rush

Armok · Post by **Armok** » Tue May 24, 2005 4:38 pm

i'll try make a few pf them . time permitting ofc..

p.s btw (<disclaimer> this is NOT a flame at all. but is pre-claiming considered OK on pryd/hib for ML raids? ) . cos i have 2-3 toons i need to get ml's on and i am considering doing some of my own ML raids in future once i am settles into hib properly.

Armok · Post by **Armok** » Tue May 24, 2005 4:43 pm

Rowenna wrote:.

i have leadalout of ml rushes as a Alb player trow freddys forums some have fallow me there but as i mowed to hib as aplayer i thought i start a Ml rush here fore hibs and will do alout of times ahead fore you

try bear in mind mate (not a flame) that some ML's in HIB i'd imagine are done differently than on alb.. due to different classes etc etc

... not doubting your ability to lead a raid on hib at all.. just asking thats all

Puppet · Post by **Puppet** » Tue May 24, 2005 10:54 pm

Is it me or is the pre-claiming abit ZzzzzZzzz ?

`Naema · Post by **`Naema** » Tue May 24, 2005 11:14 pm

I guess he needs a new sponsor to copy his pre claimed template of his cleric to Pryd/Hib on his druid :sheepskip

Puppet · Post by **Puppet** » Tue May 24, 2005 11:33 pm

`Naema wrote:I guess he needs a new sponsor to copy his pre claimed template of his cleric to Pryd/Hib on his druid :sheepskip

Abit silly considering druids can get a good version of GoV - dont see any reason to use the ML2.10 hauberk then really

Kias · Post by **Kias** » Wed May 25, 2005 7:28 am

Puppet wrote:Is it me or is the pre-claiming abit ZzzzzZzzz ?

considering the time and effort you need to put into leading/organising something on this scale theres nothing wrong with it in my opinion.

Elrandhir · Post by **Elrandhir** » Thu May 26, 2005 2:21 pm

Kias wrote:considering the time and effort you need to put into leading/organising something on this scale theres nothing wrong with it in my opinion.

Agrees, and those who don´t lead one yourself instead... have never lead anything major and I don´t intend to, just to lazy and things like this don´t give me any joy... so I think the leaders can preclaim what they want, even though ofcourse less people will probably come to the raids of those preclaiming, I wouldent care though if I got the Encounters or whatever I needed done.

But say 1 item atleast, is more then fair, and if anyone would have any complains about that, if I lead a raid woud just say that... well you don´t need to attend, go make your own raid " Can´t understand how those that have to be so greedy that they can´t let those leeding the raid get this atleast ;D.

1 Item is more then fair anyhow

Kallima · Post by **Kallima** » Thu May 26, 2005 2:35 pm

Puppet wrote:Is it me or is the pre-claiming abit ZzzzzZzzz ?

I think its ok. If you lead a full master level raid then saying you want to pre claim one item if it drops seems reasonable, and I thought this was a total of four items from ten full raids. Less than one per raid and clearly stated in advance.

Elrandhir · Post by **Elrandhir** » Thu May 26, 2005 2:43 pm

Kallima wrote:I think its ok. If you lead a full master level raid then saying you want to pre claim one item if it drops seems reasonable, and I thought this was a total of four items from ten full raids. Less than one per raid and clearly stated in advance.

Yes, and I think that instead of raidleaders being the ones who are greedy, it's those thinking that the raidleaders shouldent get this, is the ones that are... really "GREEDY".

Post by **Lieva** » Thu May 26, 2005 3:40 pm

Easy people.

Youll notice i deleted a few posts. dont make me delete those too

i left the puppet ZzzzZzz remark one in as raid rules like this

Lotto:

*I decide what is lottoed.
*Everyone can roll for anything, I couldn't care less.

end up with people flaming each other on the forums later. So this needs to be specified abit clearer.