Angry Squirrels - Application

Sharkith · Post by **Sharkith** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 5:49 pm

but they didn't answer it......

Belisar · Post by **Belisar** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 5:53 pm

They are not actually angry - just mildly annoyed

Sharkith · Post by **Sharkith** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 5:59 pm

so its a misnomer then. :/

Belisar · Post by **Belisar** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 6:08 pm

Yeah - I think they decided being called "Slightly Annoyed Squirrels" would have sounded odd.

Sharkith · Post by **Sharkith** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 6:15 pm

hmmmm I suppose.

I preferred it when they was angry.

Cryn · Post by **Cryn** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 6:48 pm

I've fought alongside the Less Than Amused Squirrels once or twice and they all seem very nice.

Satyn · Post by **Satyn** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 6:48 pm

Sharkith wrote:

but they didn't answer it......

yes they did

We're not really angry, just slightly miffed.

levelnix · Post by **levelnix** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:56 am

sorry must use my veto right for aurora borealis
before mirage isn t back i can t agree your joining
i m sure you great guys but so many things happen last few days that
this would not be right to let you in
i have no problem to say this on board because i hate the way like
it happens with mirage where a gm agreement was broken and we still don t know who was it who forced others to break it too
i m really pissed and imo thats really fig and a bad attitude wich we don t need in the ally

cu levelnix

Bourkey · Post by **Bourkey** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:08 am

levelnix wrote:sorry must use my veto right for aurora borealis
before mirage isn t back i can t agree your joining
i m sure you great guys but so many things happen last few days that
this would not be right to let you in
i have no problem to say this on board because i hate the way like
it happens with mirage where a gm agreement was broken and we still don t know who was it who forced others to break it too
i m really pissed and imo thats really fig and a bad attitude wich we don t need in the ally

cu levelnix

Can you veto without a good reason? I thought the whole princible of the veto was to do it, with a good reason. Youve just openly admitted you have no reason and they are good guys, so what are you gonna do now, edit your post and say that they ripped you off or something?

levelnix · Post by **levelnix** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:48 am

Bourkey wrote:Can you veto without a good reason? I thought the whole princible of the veto was to do it, with a good reason. Youve just openly admitted you have no reason and they are good guys, so what are you gonna do now, edit your post and say that they ripped you off or something?

said my reason and it s a good reason because this
can t work like this thats not fair