Oh and Puppet what are you doing, you're not meant to agree with me, and vice versa

It's not just numbers tho', a good/bad rating on a post does slant how peeps might view an otherwise neutral post. Also, with the usual mob mentality, a post which has a bad rating will prolly be far more likely to get flamed with repliers safe in the knowledge peeps anonimously agree with them.Mojo wrote:it is a numbers game (for some at least) I personally don't care and it won't change the way I post.
No point boring people here with sensless posts - I will pm you. This mystifies me.Xest wrote:It's the fact that it doesn't matter if you're posting a point or countering a point Sharkith, you always claim it's the burden of whoevers disagreeing with you to prove their point and never upto you to prove your point, that's horribly arrogant.
Satyn wrote:and thats what I call childishwhy cant ppl just be mature and use the system likes its ment to be used?
Yeah I guess, I just don't think like that. I generally do what i want regardless of anyone or anything else and i don't often think that others would actually care enough or be so easily led as to do that kinda stuff. I did witness the old shout count spam wars tho which was a numbers thing.Maeloch wrote:It's not just numbers tho', a good/bad rating on a post does slant how peeps might view an otherwise neutral post. Also, with the usual mob mentality, a post which has a bad rating will prolly be far more likely to get flamed with repliers safe in the knowledge peeps anonimously agree with them.
I don't think it's any big deal tbh, just a bit silly and needless.
What's to stop peeps having a big circle jerk on their guild forums for example, giving each other positive ratings over spam?