Cromcruaich wrote:It's a shame you arnt prepared on here to defend your views on creationism in any logical or meaningful way. The questions people have asked you, they no doubt asked themselves many years ago. I can only hope you are now prepared to ask them of yourself, and if your only answer is dogged blind faith, then you know in your head, if not your heart that the religious dogma you hold dear has fundamental floors that you need to explore.
To be honest, I am somewhat overwhelmed atm. So many people opposing me and probably only one other person (Banana) brave enough to stand on my side of the fence by admitting a belief in God. I haven't even had the chance to read through all the posts because, quite frankly, there are so many and my time on the Internet is restricted somewhat during the day. The only time I get is in the evening when I'm home, but even then, cooking meals for my wife and I, washing the dishes, watching Star Trek on the Sci-Fi Channel and all the other 1001 tasks that I have to do severely limit my time on the Internet. On top of that, there are the Spellcrafting orders that are stacking up!
I'm not a scientist, I'm a Graphic Designer (sounds a bit like Dr. McCoy) and the highest qualification in the sciences that I hold is a grade C in GCSE Physics. So if you want scientific explanations for why I believe what I believe, then you won't get them from me, or should I say, I lack the knowledge to explain my beliefs in scientific terms. Oh, I know the basics and I've done a lot of study in my favourite area of Physics, time and relativity, but that's only from a layman's point of view.
Is it a triangle, or is it a rectangle? Well, the scientist and the believer in God are like the two people in the diagram I published in my earlier post. Both believe they are right and from one point of view only, both are correct. However, if both people could see the whole picture, then they could see perhaps that there is room for both groups to be satisfied. All it takes is the maturity to accept that there are different points of view and that no-one has all the answers. Anyone who says they know everything is not telling the truth. A scientist claiming to have the explanation for everything is no worse than a believer in God making the same claim, both are at extremes of the scale. I have an open mind and I accept both sides of the argument. I am willing to accept that I may be wrong, but I have the faith to believe that there is a God and faith is the name of the game and the measure of a person's character. How many others are mature enough to believe that? I listed on a previous thread all the famous scientists, including Einstein, who also believed in God... even Stephen Hawking! Are they, with scientific minds so far more advanced than probably anyone on this forum in the wrong? Perhaps they are... or is it just because they realise that there is far more to heaven and earth than meets the eye?
I could go on, but I won't atm, because I now have to get ready to go out for a night at the theatre (no, not an operating theatre!).
When I get the chance, I will share my experiences that led to me becoming a born-again Christian, what it feels like and what it means to me. That's the best I can do. That's not a failing, because if God wants others to follow him, then the process of becoming a believer needs to be simple enough for everyone to follow... even someone as simple as me!
Bye for now.